-
Website
http://philbaumann.com/ -
Original page
http://philbaumann.com/2009/11/06/zen-and-the-art-of-the-tweet/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
andraz
2 comments · 1 points
-
Sean Dent
7 comments · 3 points
-
medxcentral (Jim)
12 comments · 2 points
-
Strong One
24 comments · 1 points
-
hidama
8 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Digital Vertigo and the Cult of Authenticity
1 week ago · 4 comments
-
SixthSense Technology – A Whole New Web
4 weeks ago · 3 comments
-
Digital Vertigo and the Cult of Authenticity
As much as it's laughable to think that these media can be a time-sink, it's
going to be important that people know how they affect their productivity.
You want to be aware of the present moment- but to attempt to be aware of this thought of a 'present moment', you are still working in the duality of a past self that is not aware of the present moment and a future self that hopefully will be aware of a present moment. What will arise, will only arise in non-volition.
You distinguish between the Twitter Mind and some 'mind' which provides meaning- where are these minds coming from? The 'mind' you propose is the Pseudo-Spiritual mind, which is, in the end, still within the realm of thoughts in your brain. No different- only perceived as different. In awakening, there is nothing to do, nothing to be changed or transformed because there is only the present self.
Moments in your life are like waves in the ocean- when does the wave start and the ocean end? Our mere sense of presence, the 'I am' has defined the boundaries, in both spatial and temporal dimensions. It is the manifestation of what could be, if something could be and thus, manifestation is merely manifestation, thought is merely thought and Twitter is merely Twitter. It is the wave which believes it is the wave- not realizing that at no point is it distinct from the entiriety of consciousness. And thus the question of why I should do this or that becomes irrelevant because there never was anyone asking it.
Look, you can take philosophy to any extreme you'd like. But the fact of the
matter is that our attention is going to become increasingly frayed as
technologies proliferate.
By your logic, we should believe in anything.
I do not doubt the logic of your article- my point is that attempting to stop this process of flitting from thought to thought is also flitting to another thought- which has arisen, post the uncondition acceptance of your presence. At this moment, it does not even matter if you exist or not, what matters is that you have unconditionally accepted that you do and thus, have become the medium for thought. As a medium, trying to change or tranform yourself into someone you are not is as much just a thought in your brain as your 'Monkey Mind'. Desire for spiritual growth is in no way 'better' than desire to have sex with a prostitute, it merely has a righteous halo. Who has divided reality into the yesterday you, the today you and the tomorrow you? It is you. You have superimposed these dimensions on chaotic thoughts in your brain.
To sum up in an analogy, a sage, coming across a scantily dressed prositute, took her in his arms and helped her crossed the raging river. Many miles and days later, the disciple could take it no more and so he burst out and questioned the sage on holding a symbol of materialism etc. etc. The sage smiled. "Are you still holding her?"
Acceptance of the world’s manifestation and rejection of the world’s manifestation- how are they different?
Enjoying this conversation.
stilling the mind is not a trying- it also not a not trying- as i mentioned in the first post, what will arise, will arise in non-volition. abandon causality and what will happen, will happen.